Legal Restraints

When looking at creating and publishing a magazine, it is important to explore the different rules and regulations which surround the content of what can and cannot be published. If these rules and regulations are not adhered to, severe consequences can be put in place to ensure that the companies involved are stopped from publishing. In terms of case studies, I have been looking at the case of 'The News Of The World'. In this instance the 'phone hacking scandal' took place, which broke many different publishing laws and rules surrounding content and privacy. Throughout research I explored many articles, however this one stood out in terms of content and information provided:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jul/04/milly-dowler-voicemail-hacked-news-of-world

In terms of breaking this set of laws laid out by the two main regulatory bodies, one law stands out when it comes to being 'broken'. This is the law which surrounds it being illegal to lie in a published, commercial document. This law is in place to ensure that the audience is reading correct information and that it is researched and balanced. Despite this, magazines which include 'gossip' sections often break this law as they 'fabricate' stories to try and make their magazine appeal to their target audience more than their competitors do. 

In the print media industry there are two main regulatory bodies, PCC and ASA, assess and control the content of magazines. The PCC is set up to focus specifically on whether the magazine's content is correct in terms of representing their audience. This policy is alongside having a range of other codes of conduct that the publishers must follow if they want to adhere to their rules. All publishers must follow the code of 'accuracy'. This makes sure that the content of all magazines doesn't provide false information, whether that be through text or even images. Moreover, publishers must also ensure that the 'opportunity to reply' code is followed throughout content. This ensures that a full image of the story is presented to the reader and they don't just hear one side of the story. PCC also ensure that companies have a way that their audience can reply to their product, to correct, complain, inquire etc. Finally, this regulatory body ensures that 'privacy' is one of their highest priorities when assessing print mediums. The producers of media must ascertain permission from persons/associations involved and then they must ensure that they content which they cover doesn't contradict or go against anything mentioned by the subjects in question. 

Secondly, the other regulatory body, ASA, is in place to ensure that content of marketing, advertisements etc. is controlled and assessed in depth. ASA do this through a complaints investigation made about adverts, promotional material and also marketing devices. Advertising must adhere to ASA's rules and regulations to ensure that they can be used by the marketing company. These codes overlook ideas concerning marketing ideas which could mislead the audience through ambiguity regarding ideas and suggestions. Companies must hold documentary evidence which shows this.

Furthermore, and finally, media corporations can't lie, can't include pornography and can't include racism in their work as this goes again codes of conduct set out by the regulatory bodies.

Code of Practise-

All members of the press have a duty to maintain the highest professional standards. The Code, which includes this preamble and the public interest exceptions below, sets the benchmark for those ethical standards, protecting both the rights of the individual and the public's right to know. It is the cornerstone of the system of self-regulation to which the industry has made a binding commitment.

It is essential that an agreed code be honoured not only to the letter but in the full spirit. It should not be interpreted so narrowly as to compromise its commitment to respect the rights of the individual, nor so broadly that it constitutes an unnecessary interference with freedom of expression or prevents publication in the public interest.

It is the responsibility of editors and publishers to apply the Code to editorial material in both printed and online versions of publications. They should take care to ensure it is observed rigorously by all editorial staff and external contributors, including non-journalists, in printed and online versions of publications.

Editors should co-operate swiftly with the Press Complaints Commission in the resolution of complaints. Any publication judged to have breached the Code must publish the adjudication in full and with due prominence agreed by the Commission's Director, including headline reference to the PCC.

1	Accuracy
	i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including pictures. ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and - where appropriate - an apology published. In cases involving the Commission, prominence should be agreed with the PCC in advance. iii) The Press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact. iv) A publication must report fairly and accurately the outcome of an action for defamation to which it has been a party, unless an agreed settlement states otherwise, or an agreed statement is published.
2	Opportunity to reply
	A fair opportunity for reply to inaccuracies must be given when reasonably called for.
3	*Privacy
	i) Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital communications. ii) Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private life without consent. Account will be taken of the complainant's own public disclosures of information. iii) It is unacceptable to photograph individuals in private places without their consent. Note - Private places are public or private property where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.
4	*Harassment
	i) Journalists must not engage in intimidation, harassment or persistent pursuit. ii) They must not persist in questioning, telephoning, pursuing or photographing individuals once asked to desist; nor remain on their property when asked to leave and must not follow them. If requested, they must identify themselves and whom they represent. iii) Editors must ensure these principles are observed by those working for them and take care not to use non-compliant material from other sources.
5	Intrusion into grief or shock
	i) In cases involving personal grief or shock, enquiries and approaches must be made with sympathy and discretion and publication handled sensitively. This should not restrict the right to report legal proceedings, such as inquests. *ii) When reporting suicide, care should be taken to avoid excessive detail about the method used.
6	*Children
	i) Young people should be free to complete their time at school without unnecessary intrusion. ii) A child under 16 must not be interviewed or photographed on issues involving their own or another child’s welfare unless a custodial parent or similarly responsible adult consents. iii) Pupils must not be approached or photographed at school without the permission of the school authorities. iv) Minors must not be paid for material involving children’s welfare, nor parents or guardians for material about their children or wards, unless it is clearly in the child's interest. v) Editors must not use the fame, notoriety or position of a parent or guardian as sole justification for publishing details of a child’s private life.
7	*Children in sex cases
	1. The press must not, even if legally free to do so, identify children under 16 who are victims or witnesses in cases involving sex offences. 2. In any press report of a case involving a sexual offence against a child - i) The child must not be identified. ii) The adult may be identified. iii) The word "incest" must not be used where a child victim might be identified. iv) Care must be taken that nothing in the report implies the relationship between the accused and the child.
8	*Hospitals
	i) Journalists must identify themselves and obtain permission from a responsible executive before entering non-public areas of hospitals or similar institutions to pursue enquiries. ii) The restrictions on intruding into privacy are particularly relevant to enquiries about individuals in hospitals or similar institutions.
9	*Reporting of Crime
	(i) Relatives or friends of persons convicted or accused of crime should not generally be identified without their consent, unless they are genuinely relevant to the story. (ii) Particular regard should be paid to the potentially vulnerable position of children who witness, or are victims of, crime. This should not restrict the right to report legal proceedings.

10	*Clandestine devices and subterfuge
	i) The press must not seek to obtain or publish material acquired by using hidden cameras or clandestine listening devices; or by intercepting private or mobile telephone calls, messages or emails; or by the unauthorised removal of documents or photographs; or by accessing digitally-held private information without consent. ii) Engaging in misrepresentation or subterfuge, including by agents or intermediaries, can generally be justified only in the public interest and then only when the material cannot be obtained by other means.
11	Victims of sexual assault
	The press must not identify victims of sexual assault or publish material likely to contribute to such identification unless there is adequate justification and they are legally free to do so.
12	Discrimination
	i) The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual's race, colour, religion, gender, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability. ii) Details of an individual's race, colour, religion, sexual orientation, physical or mental illness or disability must be avoided unless genuinely relevant to the story.
13	Financial journalism
	i) Even where the law does not prohibit it, journalists must not use for their own profit financial information they receive in advance of its general publication, nor should they pass such information to others. ii) They must not write about shares or securities in whose performance they know that they or their close families have a significant financial interest without disclosing the interest to the editor or financial editor. iii) They must not buy or sell, either directly or through nominees or agents, shares or securities about which they have written recently or about which they intend to write in the near future.
14	Confidential sources
	Journalists have a moral obligation to protect confidential sources of information.
15	Witness payments in criminal trials
	i) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness - should be made in any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. This prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed unconditionally by police without charge or bail or the proceedings are otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court; or, in the event of a not guilty plea, the court has announced its verdict. *ii) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and foreseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness, unless the information concerned ought demonstrably to be published in the public interest and there is an over-riding need to make or promise payment for this to be done; and all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure no financial dealings influence the evidence those witnesses give. In no circumstances should such payment be conditional on the outcome of a trial. *iii) Any payment or offer of payment made to a person later cited to give evidence in proceedings must be disclosed to the prosecution and defence. The witness must be advised of this requirement.
16	*Payment to criminals
	i) Payment or offers of payment for stories, pictures or information, which seek to exploit a particular crime or to glorify or glamorise crime in general, must not be made directly or via agents to convicted or confessed criminals or to their associates – who may include family, friends and colleagues. ii) Editors invoking the public interest to justify payment or offers would need to demonstrate that there was good reason to believe the public interest would be served. If, despite payment, no public interest emerged, then the material should not be published.
THE PUBLIC INTEREST There may be exceptions to the clauses marked * where they can be demonstrated to be in the public interest. 1. The public interest includes, but is not confined to: i) Detecting or exposing crime or serious impropriety. i i) Protecting public health and safety. iii) Preventing the public from being misled by an action or statement of an individual or organisation. 2. There is a public interest in freedom of expression itself. 3. Whenever the public interest is invoked, the PCC will require editors to demonstrate fully that they reasonably believed that publication, or journalistic activity undertaken with a view to publication, would be in the public interest and how, and with whom, that was established at the time. 4. The PCC will consider the extent to which material is already in the public domain, or will become so. 5. In cases involving children under 16, editors must demonstrate an exceptional public interest to over-ride the normally paramount interest of the child.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2240715/Leveson-Report-Investigative-journalists-breach-data-protection-rules-face-2-years-jail.html

Through looking at this article, I have began to understand why it is important for journalists to cut out the use of personal information in their work - this follows on from the 'phone hacking scandal'.